Notionally, under the new concept the carrier would keep a guided-missile cruiser that would serve as the air defense commander for the strike group, an oiler for resupply and take on destroyers as needed. Robert Westendorf is now studying, would break off the destroyers from the OFRP cycle for their own training and deployment regime. The rigid 36-month-long maintenance, training and deployment was introduced in 2014 to maximize the surge capacity of the Navy’s carrier strike groups, but has struggled to keep pace with the demand for forces.Ĭaudle’s idea, which Fleet Force’s readiness officer Rear Adm. Now, the strike group – a guided-missile cruiser, an air wing and up to five guided-missile destroyers – moves together through the Navy’s Optimized Fleet Response Plan. USS Bainbridge (DDG-96) transits alongside USS Harry S. Our ships should not have to work up together to fight effectively together.” “This requires our surface combatants to be much more plug-and-play inherently. “Fleet commanders and combatant commanders require command elements that can seamlessly integrate into the battlespace, into existing communications and data networks, and into existing battle rhythms without skipping a beat,” he said. The study is looking at the efficiencies Fleet Forces could find by deploying formations to the Atlantic and removing the strike group’s guided-missile destroyers from operating in lockstep with the capital ship, Caudle said in a speech during the Surface Navy Association symposium on Wednesday. Fleet Forces is rethinking how to deploy carrier strike groups by changing how it would train and maintain its guided-missile destroyers, commander Adm. USS Milius (DDG-69) sails alongside U.S., Japanese Maritime Self-defense Force and Royal Australian Navy ships as seen from USS Chancellorsville (CG-62) in the Philippine Sea on Nov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |